Every RRSP season, the same debate resurfaces. Some Canadians see RRSPs as essential. Others avoid them entirely, often with strong opinions. The most common argument is simple. You pay tax when you withdraw, so why bother?

That argument sounds logical. It is also incomplete.

RRSPs are not about avoiding tax forever. They are about when tax is paid, how much capital compounds, and what alternatives truly cost after tax.

Once those three factors are understood, RRSPs become less about belief and more about arithmetic.

‍

The Core Misunderstanding

The biggest misconception about RRSPs is focusing only on the withdrawal tax and ignoring the deduction at contribution.

When you contribute to an RRSP, you reduce your taxable income. That tax reduction is not a bonus. It is deferred tax. The government is effectively allowing you to invest money that would otherwise have gone to taxes.

This matters because investment growth depends heavily on starting capital.

More capital invested earlier compounds into a meaningfully larger outcome over time.

‍

A Simple One-Year Example

Assume the following

Annual income available to invest is $3,000
Marginal tax rate is 33 percent
Investment return is 5 percent
The time horizon is one year

‍

RRSP scenario

The full $3,000 is invested because no tax is paid upfront.
After one year at 5 percent, the value becomes $3,150.

If the funds are withdrawn immediately and taxed at the same rate, tax is approximately $1,050.
After-tax value is $2,100.

Non-registered scenario

Tax is paid first. About $1,000 goes to tax, leaving $2,000 to invest.
At 5 percent growth, the investment becomes $2,100.

Assuming the growth is capital gains and half is taxable, the tax on the gain is minimal.
After-tax value is roughly $2,080.

Even over one year, the RRSP leaves you with more money.

The difference grows substantially over longer time periods.

‍

Why Capital Gains Do Not Automatically Win

Non-registered investing is often promoted because capital gains are taxed at a lower effective rate.

That is true, but it ignores two structural disadvantages.

First, you invest less money upfront because tax is paid immediately.
Second, investment income may be taxed annually, reducing compounding efficiency.

RRSPs eliminate both issues.

They allow full pre-tax dollars to grow without annual tax friction.

‍

The RRSP as a Shared Account

One useful way to think about an RRSP is as a shared account between you and the government.

The portion equal to your tax rate does not truly belong to you. It is deferred tax.
The remaining portion is your actual capital.

What matters is that both portions grow together, tax-free, for decades.

If your tax rate in retirement is lower than during your working years, your share grows more efficiently than it ever could in a taxable account.

Even if the rate is the same, the outcome matches a tax-free investment.
That is mathematically powerful.

‍

Long-Term Compounding Changes Everything

Consider a $10,000 RRSP contribution made at a 30 percent tax rate.

Economically, you invested $7,000 and deferred $3,000 in tax.
If the investment doubles over time, the total becomes $20,000.

When withdrawn at the same tax rate, $6,000 goes to tax.
$14,000 remains after tax.

Your original $7,000 effectively doubled, without annual tax drag.

Achieving the same result in a non-registered account would require a significantly higher pre-tax return.

‍

When RRSPs May Not Be the First Choice

RRSPs are not perfect for everyone.

They may be less effective for individuals with very low income today and much higher expected income later.
They may also be secondary to TFSAs for those with limited savings capacity.

But these are exceptions, not the rule.

For most middle- and high-income Canadians with long investment horizons, RRSPs remain one of the most efficient tools available.

‍

The Real Question

The real question is not whether RRSP withdrawals are taxed.

Everything is taxed somewhere.

The real question is whether you want to invest with after-tax dollars or pre-tax dollars, and whether you want your growth taxed annually or deferred for decades.

Once framed that way, the answer becomes less emotional and more mathematical.

And math, unlike belief, does not change with opinion.

‍